GIANNA'S Story
Gianna
Marie Pandolfino
was born on July 9, 2000, the third child to proud
parents Paul and Janine Pandolfino from Holliston,
Massachusetts. Gianna was born a beautiful, healthy,
happy baby girl. During Gianna’s two-week checkup,
Janine told Gianna’s pediatrician that she had witnessed
Gianna having what appeared to be “twitching” in her
legs. The doctor told Janine that it was just an
underdeveloped nervous system and not to be concerned
because Gianna would grow out of it.
On
September 11, 2000, Janine took her two-month old
daughter to the pediatrician’s office
for her first round of
vaccination shots including
the DPT (Diphtheria, Pertussis, & Tetanus) vaccination.
Less that one week later while Gianna lay sleeping in
her room with the door closed, her
father heard a banging noise coming from the nursery.
Paul entered Gianna’s room where he found his daughter
convulsing in her crib causing the crib
to hit against the bedroom wall. Not knowing
exactly what was happening to his daughter at the time,
Paul picked his daughter up, the convulsion stopped, and
Gianna appeared to be fine.
On October 1, 2000,
Janine witnessed Gianna having a seizure while sleeping
in her arms at church. Janine immediately hurried home,
called the pediatrician’s office to notify them of her
daughter’s condition, and was advised to go to the
emergency room of their local hospital. The
Pandolfino’s did just that. Gianna
was rushed to the emergency room where she was to stay
for a 4-day workup including metabolic tests, MRI, and
EEG. Everything came back as normal so the doctors
concluded a short course of Phenobarbital with the
suggestion to maintain the dose at a therapeutic
level for three to four months. Gianna was
discharged to go home on
October 4, 2000, after doing well on the medication with
no further seizure activity.
On October 12, 2000, Gianna
began to have breakthrough seizures, and by November 13,
2000, her dose of Phenobarbital was increased. Seven
days later, Gianna’s
pediatrician wanted to administer additional routine
vaccinations. The Pandolfino’s were very reluctant to
do so and originally postponed Gianna’s appointment as
they always believed the initial vaccinations were the
cause of Gianna’s problems. Their pediatrician spoke to
them about this and felt that the vaccinations had
nothing to do with Gianna’s seizures, and so placing
their trust in the pediatrician, they proceeded.
On November 20, 2000, Gianna was scheduled to have the second round
of vaccinations including the
DPT
booster vaccination. Two days after the shots were
administered; Gianna began to experience violent
seizures. Janine called the pediatrician’s office on
November 22, 2000 to speak to the doctor. Janine was
told that the pediatrician was off for the Thanksgiving
holiday. Having been through this before, Paul and
Janine decided to wait to speak to the doctor to discuss
what to do. Five days would pass before the
Pandolfino’s would actually speak to Gianna’s
pediatrician, which was her first day back after the
holiday. Gianna’s condition continued to worsen over a
period of two and a half weeks, which resulted in an
increased dosage of Phenobarbital to try to control the
seizures.
With seizures continuing to worsen, the Pandolfino’s were advised
by their pediatrician to take Gianna to Children’s
Hospital in Boston on December 15, 2000. Since Gianna’s
seizures usually occurred at night when sleeping, the
doctors did not have the opportunity to witness any
seizures. Consequently, the doctors examined her and
noted Gianna to be a healthy, happy 5-month-old baby
girl with excellent responsive eye and hand
coordination. The physicians also noted that Gianna’s
motor skills were so advanced that they appeared to be
comparable to an average 8-month-old child.
On December 17, 2000 when Gianna’s condition became unmanageable,
she was admitted back into Children’s Hospital in
Boston. There she was placed on multiple medications
and remained there until she was discharged on December
29, 2000.
Six days later, Gianna was re-admitted to Children’s Hospital for
increasing seizure activity. Gianna’s condition took a
devastating turn for the worse. It got to the point
where Paul and Janine could not even touch their child
because it would cause Gianna an increase in seizure
activity. You could only imagine the struggle the
Pandolfino’s were feeling at that time as they stood by
watching their baby girl slip away. Paul
describes the experience as watching your house on fire
with your child banging on the window to help her get
out and not being able to help in any way, but watch
from a distance. Days later Gianna went into
status (constant seizures and not coming out) and
stopped breathing, whereby it was advised to intubate
and put her in a drug-induced coma and place her on life
support to give her brain a rest. This was supposed to
be for one week. However, after one week when they
tried to excubate, she would go into status and her
breathing would be compromised. As a result, Gianna
became one of the most difficult cases in ICU.
Undiagnosed, and doctors not knowing the correct course
of treatment, Gianna lay in a drug-induced coma on
life support for five months.
During Gianna’s five month hospital stay (with her mother by her
side 24 hours a day), Gianna experienced the
unthinkable. Gianna was repeatedly overmedicated from
members of their nursing staff from misreading the
charts. The physicians kept medicating her with such
large doses of narcotics that consequently the narcotics
caused Gianna to have permanent brain damage from
atrophy on both sides of her brain.
This has been documented in MRI tests.
In addition, during her stay
in the hospital Gianna received multiple fractures
from the physical therapists including, a broken
hip, two broken shoulders, four fractures in her back, a
broken femur, and broken tibia while still in a
drug-induced coma.
With Gianna fighting for her life, the Chief of Neurology called a
meeting to inform the Pandolfino family that Gianna
would not live more than two months and would die from
respiratory and/or liver failure, because he was sure
she had a very rare brain disorder called “Alpers
disease”, which is incurable and always fatal. Paul
asked the doctor if he was sure, and asked if he had
ever seen a miracle in a case like this. The doctor
said, “No, I’m sorry I haven’t, but I relish the
thought.” Paul then placed his hand on the doctor’s
shoulder and told the doctor that they would pray for
him to get his miracle. The Pandolfino family relied
solely on their faith and chose prayer over the doctor’s
death sentence!
Paul and Janine turned to their faith once again and began to
pray. The Pandolfino’s believed that if Gianna did not
leave the hospital, she would surely die there. The
Pandolfino’s informed the hospital that they intended to
take their baby girl home, and asked to take her out of
the coma and off the life support. The hospital warned
them that it was against medical advice. They told the
hospital staff that their daughter had a home and a
family, and if Gianna was going to die “Why can’t she
die at home with dignity in the care of hospice and
surrounded by her loving family?” The doctors finally
conceded, but highly recommended a life support machine
and a g-tube (feeding tube). Janine said “Timeout, when
is it enough?” and fought to bring Gianna home without a
feeding tube or life support. Within a few weeks, Paul
and Janine scurried out of the hospital with Gianna
wrapped in a blanket gasping for every breath and
seizing all the way home. Trucks followed, bringing
oxygen, a continuous positive airway pressure machine, a
heart and oxygen saturation monitor, a suction machine,
and all of the medications to their home. After a few
weeks, Paul and Janine realized there was no need to
contact hospice at this time, they were caring for their
daughter and joining Gianna in the fight for her life!
Over four months had passed since the Chief of Neurology had given
a two-month death sentence. Upon doing some research,
Janine believed that the benzodiazepine medication
(which suppresses the respiratory system) was
suffocating her daughter to death.
Thus, the next battle began . . . weaning Gianna off the sixteen
medications that her doctors had prescribed for
her. That was very difficult, but necessary if Gianna
was going to survive. The process of weaning anyone
addicted to drugs is very difficult to watch. It took a
total of a year and half to wean Gianna off the
medications. Gianna was doing better; she had won that
fight, but the battle was long from over.
Most people have no idea how many vaccine related injuries there
have been in this country. More
than 12,000 infants in the United States have been
injured or died as a result of a vaccine injury between
1989 - 2007.
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Prior to October 1, 1988, in the event of a suspected vaccine
injury, a parent could seek legal counsel to represent
their child in vaccine related injury cases against the
big drug companies and/or their physicians.
Since then, Congress voted to change the laws governing the
liability of injuries caused from vaccinations and on
October 1, 1988, the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (NVICP) went into effect. NVICP
was created to eliminate frivolous lawsuits and
eliminate the liability of the drug companies that
manufacture the vaccines and the physicians that
administer them.
NVICP is a “no-fault” alternative to the traditional tort system
for resolving certain vaccine injury claims. The new
NVICP program allows a U.S Court of Federal Claims to
decide which claims are denied and which claims are
compensated providing victims and their families with
the resources to fund the appropriate ongoing care for
as long as the victims live.
Note:
It is documented that ONLY one out of eight
vaccine injury claims actually receives ANY
compensation.
Since October 1, 1988, every time a vaccination is sold, the
federal government applies a surcharge tax. Those
proceeds, now in the billions, are placed in the
“National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Fund”.
Upon learning of the NVICP government program, the Pandolfino’s
initiated a claim to seek funding to facilitate the
special needs of their daughter. That claim lead to an
investigation through the federal government. In their
quest to seek justice for what had happened to their
daughter, the Pandolfino’s ambitiously tried to find the
physicians that had cared for Gianna to sign a document
that would acknowledge the correlation between Gianna’s
vaccinations and her illness. “Off the record” the
Pandolfino’s had little trouble finding doctors to
substantiate their suspicions. Unfortunately, the
doctors feared more for their own liability than they
did about Gianna and her family’s future.
While in the hospital, a neurologist specializing in epilepsy told
Janine “off the record” that her daughter’s condition
could have been caused from her DPT vaccination. He
added that she would never find anyone that would take
responsibility for that.
Determined, Janine met with another one of Gianna’s neurologists in
hopes to receive a letter stating that it is possible
that Gianna was harmed due to the vaccine. When Janine
followed up in person to see if the doctor had completed
her letter, she regretfully declined in fear of future
repercussions stating, “You will never get me or my
colleagues to put it in writing.”
Persistent in her quest, Janine found Dr. Schweller who would
testify on Gianna’s behalf. However, the court would
later rule that the pediatrician’s office could not find
the documented medical record corroborating Mrs.
Pandolfino’s claim on November 22, 2000 that “Gianna had
violent seizures unlike she had experienced before.”
The detail in accuracy of any information recorded in a medical
file depends solely on the person who is receiving the
information and their ability to record it properly.
Timing is everything. If a patient calls a physician’s
office and a receptionist answers the phone all while
other lines are ringing, other patients are coming and
going and you want to leave a message; the accuracy
depends solely on how focused and detailed that
individual is.
For example, when Mrs. Pandolfino called her pediatrician’s office
on November 22, 2000 (after the second round of shots),
she asked to speak to the pediatrician. Mrs. Pandolfino
conveyed she had concerns about her daughter having
violent seizures unlike anything she had seen before.
The receptionist informed Mrs. Pandolfino that the
pediatrician was off that day. Janine replied “Oh. Ok…
I’ll call her tomorrow.” Then the receptionist informed
her the next day was Thanksgiving and that the doctor
would not be in until Monday. The receptionist informed
Mrs. Pandolfino that she could bring Gianna to the
emergency room.
Now when the courts subpoenaed the medical records the receptionist
put a “post-it” note saying Mrs. Pandolfino called
“It was ok”. Now WHY would anyone call a doctor’s
office to tell them everything is ok? No, what Mrs.
Pandolfino said was . . . “Oh. Ok… I’ll call her
tomorrow.” It comes down to the accuracy of the
individual taking the message, or lack of it, in this
case.
The investigation took five years. The court argued
that in the event of a vaccine injury, a physician must
be notified on behalf of the patient within 3 days from
the date of the vaccination to be eligible for a claim.
The records indicated the Pandolfino’s did not actually
speak to their doctor until 5 days after the
vaccination. (Obviously, an attempt was made as
documented by a “post-it” note, incorrectly I might
add.) Mrs. Pandolfino argued that she had called two
days after the vaccination and attempted to reach
the doctor who was out of the office over the
Thanksgiving holiday and did not return their call until
the fifth day. It came down to a technicality, a holiday
no less, and an inaccurately documented post-it note. A
judge concluded that he could not rule in favor of the
Pandolfino’s case.
According to the findings, judges are expected to rule only on what
is documented. I suspect that is why 7 out of 8
claims are denied in the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program.
To add to their hardship, the same governmental agency that turned
down the Pandolfino’s claim has since changed the
“3-day” policy to its current “7-day” policy.
Unfortunately, the Pandolfino’s statute of limitations
has since run out!
Frustrated and in disbelief, the Pandolfino’s turned to a law firm
to review the hospital care that Gianna received that
ultimately lead to Gianna’s permanent brain damage and
multiple fractures. The attorney reviewed the case and
concluded that because Children’s Hospital in Boston is
a teaching hospital, the hospital had a liability cap of
twenty-thousand dollars. Moreover, Gianna’s medical
staff changed every two-weeks; therefore, it would be
impossible to single out any particular medical
personnel for the negligence. The attorney went on to
explain that their law firm would take one third. Janine
told the attorney the net amount would not even cover
the cost of a handicap van! Feeling beaten down and
emotionally exhausted, the Pandolfino’s declined to
pursue further legal action.
Forty years ago, children received five vaccines. Today, it is
estimated that a fully vaccinated
child receives 25-40
vaccines during the critical
early stages of life, when their developing immune
system is most vulnerable. Even an adult’s immune
system would be challenged by such an onslaught.
The
Pandolfino’s Purpose
The Pandolfino’s purpose for wanting to bring this topic to a
national platform is not to discourage the use of
vaccinations, or minimize the importance of
immunizations. They know that vaccinations have
virtually eliminated many diseases that could have
otherwise spread worldwide.
Their
heartfelt desire is to:
-
Encourage both physicians and parents alike to check infants for
signs of underdeveloped nervous systems and to
prescreen families with a history of seizures prior to
administering the Pertussis vaccination.
-
Bring awareness about the number of vaccines that are currently
being administered simultaneously (as directed by the
insurance providers to be more cost effective) and the
dangers associated with some vaccines in some cases.
-
Encourage the distribution of more comprehensive information to
further educate the physicians and/or nurses that
administer the vaccines and the families that receive
them.
-
Educate the doctors/vaccine administrators that if a vaccine injury
should occur, if they testify on behalf of a victim
for the NVICP- they are protected. Neither a victim
nor the victim’s family can ever bring a future
malpractice suit against them.
-
Stress that parents are the best advocates for their children and
that it is our right as parents to question and
challenge anything a doctor suggests.
-
Bring about awareness that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program (NVICP) is in dire need of reform!
Janine shared this . . . “There is nothing short of a miracle
from God that could get Gianna out of her wheelchair,
but if telling Gianna’s story can educate the public and
save just one child or prevent one parent from going
through what we have gone through . . . then it is worth
telling!”
***
Click Here to Donate Online to
The Gianna Pandolfino Family Fund ***
|